Thursday, July 5, 2012
Don't Underestimate My Daughter!
A couple of months ago my girls and I were going to begin reading Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens for a book group we participate in. Olivia, age 11, went to the library and asked the librarian to help her look it up on the computer system. The librarian instead looked it up for her and said she'd show her where it was*. She then told her it was "a pretty big book. We have a kid version, if you'd like".
Olivia responded that she wanted the unabridged version.
Librarian: "Are you sure?"
Olivia: "Yes"
Librarian: "We have the sound recording, if that might help. Tell me when I get the book down for you if it's too big."
Olivia: "It won't be."
She now says she wishes she had said, "I'm small, not stupid!" Granted, she is small for her age, but the thing that bothers me about this exchange between librarian and patron is that the librarian repeatedly discouraged her from reading the unabridged version. If a child is willing to read difficult material, why wouldn't we let them? If it truly is too difficult for her, she will stop reading it and move on to another book, but if it isn't, how much more would she gain by reading the entire book, as written by the brilliant author?
It also bothers me that it is apparently so unusual for children to read big books that the librarian actually questions her ability to read a big book.
P.S. She read the whole 466-page book and LOVED it!
*Although this was an example of very nice customer service, it would have actually been more helpful to teach her how to use the computer search fields than to look it up for her.
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Go Cart!
One day a few weeks ago, Alex and Olivia decided to build a go-cart. They have tools in the garage and know how to use them, so they set to work. They worked for hours, but still needed some help when Dad came home from work. They petitioned him for assistance and he complied. We took a trip to the D.I. for wheels ($3) and a seat ($3) and to Home Depot for the other supplies (about $12), then came home and finished it up all in one evening. They've got a pretty great dad to drop everything to help make their dream a reality and we've got some pretty awesome kids!
Cymbalta = Poison
I've decided to post my story here as a warning to anyone who may chance upon it. The benefits of taking Cymbalta DO NOT outweigh the costs. Please read on.
I
have been taking medication for anxiety for 5 or 6 years. Prior to
that I was prescribed several antidepressants by various doctors, but
done of them really helped me feel better. When my doctor finally
figured out I had generalized anxiety disorder, not depression, and
started me on Cymbalta I felt so much better and felt like I finally had
an accurate diagnosis and a remedy that worked. I felt like a normal
person! However, I didn't want to stay on medication forever. I
recently decided that it was time to at least try resuming life without
the assistance of anxiety meds, with the knowledge that if it didn't
work well I could always get back on them.
Before
beginning the process of getting off this medication, I visited my
doctor and have been following the instructions he outlined. The first 2
weeks I was on a half dose. This felt exactly the same for me as the
full dose (60 mg). I began thinking that this transition wasn't going
to be as difficult as I had anticipated. Beginning on the 15th day,
however, I began taking a half dose
every other day. This proved to be severely detrimental to my
well-being. I think having some in my system one day and then a day
with absolutely none is too hard on my body and my mind. Not only was
my body revolting in every imaginable way, I felt like
jumping in front of a semi because my mind and emotions were unstable.
I
have had terrible dizziness, nausea, vomiting, stomach cramping,
bloating, back pain, night sweats, headaches, crying all the time,
getting mad really easily, and overall irritability. I was completely
stuck in bed because I was so sick. At this point (while lying in bed),
I decided to look online to see if others had similar experiences. I
found this hub,
which showed hundreds of people describing their experiences just as I
was then living them. It gave me so much comfort just to know that I
wasn't alone! Several people posted that they have gotten off street
drugs
and Cymbalta and that it was harder for them to get off Cymbalta. I
honestly felt like I was going insane and finding other people going
through similar experiences - and some had come back and posted after
getting better - helped me so much to have the courage to endure. Some
people posted different things they tried to help them get off the drug,
which helped me come up with a better plan for gradually reducing my
dose.
I
don't feel good
about staying on a drug that has me so terribly addicted. (One missed
dose and I am a wreck for almost 2 days.) I'm sure the benefits do not
outweigh the negative consequences for me any more and REALLY wish I had
been warned about the withdrawal period when I first went on this drug 5
or so years ago. I also really wish the doctor I went to for advice
getting off of it had known (or had told me) that it's not as easy as
the manufacturer (Lilly)
makes it sound. He did say it may take longer than the month plan he
outlined, but he didn't elaborate in any way as to why it might or how
difficult I should expect it to be. I should also note that I had read
the entire information pamphlet that comes with Cymbalta prescriptions
on three different occasions. (Not the few-page document that comes
from the pharmacy, but the actual manufacturer's pamphlet that is
written in 6 pt font!) Even that document only says that one shouldn't
stop taking it cold turkey and one should consult a doctor prior to
stopping it. Of course, how a drug affects one's body varies from
person to person and I know that the longer a person is on Cymbalta, the
harder it is to stop taking it, but considering the hundreds of posts
on the ONE hub I listed above, it seems like there should be enough
evidence that if the manufacturer cared, it would do a better job of
warning people. I also believe that doctors should learn more so they
don't carelessly prescribe this drug without warning their patients
about its addictive qualities.
After
reading the hub I linked above, I came up with a plan for reducing my
medicine more gradually. I ended up pouring out the beads from the 60
mg capsules and counting out individual beads and putting them in empty
capsules. In the 60 mg capsules, there are about 200 beads per
capsule. I decreased my dose by 1 mg per day (3 beads) for 3 weeks,
then I had to slow down because even that rate was too fast and I wasn't
able to accomplish normal daily activities. I then began taking the
same dose for 3-4 days before going down 1 mg. After 2 more weeks I
began reducing my dose by 1 more bead (approx. .3 mg) each day and
continued like that until I ran out of beads. At times I had to stop
reducing and take the same dose for a few days until my body got used to
it because even this amazingly slow rate of reduction was very
difficult. After a few days I would assume the previous rate of 1 less
bead each day.
I
have also been using essential oils. I've been using Pine Needle oil
(2 drops on the soles of my feet every 2 hours or as often as I
remember) and Ginger oil (same amount and frequency). They are said to
help the body eliminate toxins and help the brain learn to re-fire
synapses or something like that on its own. It does seem like when I
use these I do better than when I go a while without them.
My last pill! 1 bead! |
It has been three months
since I began going off Cymbalta. I took my last "bead" (about 1/3 of 1
milligram) 4 days ago. My vertigo (or brain shivers,
or brain shocks, as this withdrawal symptom has been called) has
increased dramatically just since then. I can't believe that 1 tiny
bead can make such a difference.
There
have been many times I've been tempted to go back on a steady, more
normal dose to ease the pains of withdrawal and to curb the feelings of
anxiety that have reappeared, but I was resolute! I feel strongly that
this "medicine" is more of a poison to people's bodies and the
advantages gained over other, easier-to-get-off-of medications are far
outweighed by its addictive properties.
The pharmaceutical industry has labeled the withdrawal symptoms "SSRI Discontinuation Syndrome", which apparently assuages people's fears that the medication has addictive properties. Sneaky, Eli Lilly!
The pharmaceutical industry has labeled the withdrawal symptoms "SSRI Discontinuation Syndrome", which apparently assuages people's fears that the medication has addictive properties. Sneaky, Eli Lilly!
In 1996, Eli Lilly and Company sponsored a symposium to address the increasing number of reports of patients who had difficult symptoms after going off their antidepressants: By then it had become clear that drug-company estimates that at most a few percent of those who took antidepressants would have a hard time getting off were far too low. Jerrold Rosenbaum and Maurizio Fava, researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital, found that among people getting off antidepressants, anywhere from 20 percent to 80 percent (depending on the drug) suffered what was being called antidepressant withdrawal (but which, after the symposium, was renamed “discontinuation syndrome”).[11
The World Health Organization (WHO) continues to track withdrawal syndrome, and notes: SSRIs are an example of how a conceptual confusion over terminology can affect proper reporting, interpretation and communication of adverse drug reactions related to dependence. To avoid the association with dependence, an increasing number of researchers have used a different term, discontinuation syndrome, instead of withdrawal syndrome. The number of hits for discontinuation syndrome in searches of the international medical literature began to increase, relative to the occurrence of withdrawal syndrome, in 1997 after [the Eli Lilly] symposium on antidepressant discontinuation syndrome held in 1996. In fact, dependence syndrome has been reported to the Uppsala Monitoring Centre for all SSRIs through the same postmarketing surveillance systems, although there are significantly fewer reports of dependence syndrome than of withdrawal syndrome.
I don't know about you, but 20-80% of people using the drug going through withdrawals seems pretty significant to me.
I can't help but wonder now if
maybe the reason my last baby was so difficult for the first year of his life
could have been because he was going through withdrawals too. Poor
little guy! :'( When I got pregnant, my OB said that while pregnant is not the
time to go off Cymbalta, but didn't explain how hard it would be either.
Aside
from the vertigo which continues, I now feel pretty much the same way I
did before I took Cymbalta to begin with. I feel a tremendous amount
of stress inside most of the time. This constant feeling of stress
seems to make me lose my temper faster and get irritated at everything
and everybody. I don't know how I'm going to learn to deal with feeling
this way, but I know I will never take Cymbalta poison again.
If you're interested in what wikipedia has to say about Cymbalta, read here.
It has been three months since I began going off Cymbalta. I took my last "bead" (about 1/3 of 1 milligram) 4 days ago. My vertigo has increased dramatically just since then. I can't believe that 1 tiny bead can make such a difference.
There have been many times I've been tempted to go back on a steady, more normal dose to ease the pains of withdrawal and to curb the feelings of anxiety that have reappeared, but I was resolute! I feel strongly that this "medicine" is more of a poison to people's bodies and the advantages gained over other, easier-to-get-off-of medications are far outweighed by its addictive properties.
I can't help but wonder now if
maybe the reason my last baby was so difficult for the first year of his life
could have been because he was going through withdrawals too. Poor
little guy! :'( When I got pregnant, my OB said that while pregnant is not the
time to go off cymbalta, but didn't explain how hard it would be either.
Aside from the vertigo which continues, I now feel pretty much the same way I did before I took cymbalta to begin with. I feel a tremendous amount of stress inside most of the time. This constant feeling of stress seems to make me lose my temper faster and get irritated at everything and everybody. I don't know how I'm going to learn to deal with feeling this way, but I know I will never take cymbalta poison again.
Monday, July 2, 2012
But What About Socialization???
I am sometimes told stories about home schooled children who reportedly lack "social skills".
My initial reaction is that I can't help but wonder if what they are actually trying to say is that MY children lack appropriate social skills, since they know that I home school my children. This is insulting and rude. If you have a true concern about my child, don't tell me your opinion of some other kid that you only see once or twice a week for an hour. What that parent chooses to do with his/her child is not my business and it's not yours either. If you're just making conversation and it's not about my children, you should pick appropriate conversation for your audience. If you're a teacher, I'm not going to come tell you all about what I think is wrong with the system you work in. If you're a doctor, I'm not going to tell you what I don't respect about doctors. If you choose to work outside your home, I'm not going to tell you the negative effects I think that choice is having on your kids*. It's just bad manners. I'll try to keep my mouth shut and try to avoid the topics I know we don't see eye to eye on. Besides, I don't know everything about other people's situations, even though sometimes I think I do, so I should try to err on the side of NOT judging. I'm not perfect at this either, but especially when it's someone's major life choice, we just shouldn't bring it up in light conversation. Vent session over.
Second, I wonder what behaviors they see in my children that they think sending them to public schools is going to fix. I want to point out the myriad students in public schools who are being broken along the way. Is the perceived benefit really worth the actual cost? I was educated at public schools. So was my husband. Our kids were in the public school system for many years. We have seen both sides and don't believe that public education was helping our children to become the best people they can be.
Third (and most importantly), I think they're ignorant. I don't mean that in an insulting way, but rather in the true sense of the word: they just don't know. People who have spent a good deal of time around home educated children are impressed rather than critical of them. I'll give you just one example right now: in our ward, there are multiple home schooling families and one that home educated up until a year ago. I work in the Young Women program with youth, ages 12-18. The home educated children ARE different. In our group, they're AMAZING - as in HANDS DOWN, the easiest to work with, the most emotionally stable, the most confident, the most flexible, the best at relating to adults as well as other youth. Oh, and also highly intelligent. Ask any of the leaders and I am certain they will concur. Does this mean we don't have publicly-educated girls with these attributes? NO! There are a few by the time they are 17 and 18 who have figured things out.
Another thing to consider is that if the child is different, it may not be BECAUSE they are home schooled. They may just BE different. And assuming that they would be "normal" if they were educated en mass is ridiculous.
In the past I have been guilty of not considering the long-term outcome. I thought that because what I was seeing right then didn't fit my preconceived idea of what I thought I should be seeing, that kids were being slighted. I now know a LOT of home schooling families and the long-term results are phenomenal. That in mind, who the heck cares if they are not at exactly the same level as their same-age peers along the way? They more than make up for it in the long-run. There is a certain young man I know who I didn't think would ever fit in with "normal" kids. I judged his parents and thought they were doing him a disservice by educating him at home. I have to admit I was wrong now. In the past two years especially, he has developed into a most amazing youth. And through the years he hasn't been ostracized by his peers because the home educated children he spends his time with respect differences in personality, don't expect everyone to be the same, and have allowed him to become who HE is, rather than trying to convince him he should be more like them.
I have never met a home schooling parent who did not REALLY care about what was best for their children and who wasn't sincerely doing what he/she feels is BEST for their child.
Home schooling families tend to function with amazing unity. Why is this? I can't be sure, but I think it's because they understand that the family is the core unit of society. The other activities they are involved in are extracurricular - they can't easily block out the family as a necessary evil because so much time is spent with the family, so they have to make it work. Instead of a few hours together in the evenings (and even that long is becoming quite unusual in most families I know), they spend many hours together every day. Why do people criticize this? Don't we WANT family to be the most important thing, both as they are growing up and when they have their own families? Their families become their best friends at a young age, rather than once they reach adulthood. Friends come and go, so why do we encourage them to develop those friendships as if they are the most important relationships?
I sent my daughter to junior high last year because she didn't want to be home schooled. She was there all of two months before she was begging us to get her out of there. We made her stay until the semester break. In the few short months she attended junior high, we noticed a huge decline in her self-confidence, her enthusiasm for life, her desire to learn, and she became depressed. Of course, this is not the experience of every publicly-educated child, but I would have been a neglectful parent to have forced her to remain in an environment that was having that effect on her. So even if she develops completely backwards social skills (which, of course, is absurd), it will be worth getting her out of that toxic environment.
The following article is from a newsletter put out by TJED.org (TJED=Thomas Jefferson Education). You can see the original source by clicking here. I think it does a good job of helping to sort out the firmly-held myths regarding socialization.
My initial reaction is that I can't help but wonder if what they are actually trying to say is that MY children lack appropriate social skills, since they know that I home school my children. This is insulting and rude. If you have a true concern about my child, don't tell me your opinion of some other kid that you only see once or twice a week for an hour. What that parent chooses to do with his/her child is not my business and it's not yours either. If you're just making conversation and it's not about my children, you should pick appropriate conversation for your audience. If you're a teacher, I'm not going to come tell you all about what I think is wrong with the system you work in. If you're a doctor, I'm not going to tell you what I don't respect about doctors. If you choose to work outside your home, I'm not going to tell you the negative effects I think that choice is having on your kids*. It's just bad manners. I'll try to keep my mouth shut and try to avoid the topics I know we don't see eye to eye on. Besides, I don't know everything about other people's situations, even though sometimes I think I do, so I should try to err on the side of NOT judging. I'm not perfect at this either, but especially when it's someone's major life choice, we just shouldn't bring it up in light conversation. Vent session over.
Second, I wonder what behaviors they see in my children that they think sending them to public schools is going to fix. I want to point out the myriad students in public schools who are being broken along the way. Is the perceived benefit really worth the actual cost? I was educated at public schools. So was my husband. Our kids were in the public school system for many years. We have seen both sides and don't believe that public education was helping our children to become the best people they can be.
Third (and most importantly), I think they're ignorant. I don't mean that in an insulting way, but rather in the true sense of the word: they just don't know. People who have spent a good deal of time around home educated children are impressed rather than critical of them. I'll give you just one example right now: in our ward, there are multiple home schooling families and one that home educated up until a year ago. I work in the Young Women program with youth, ages 12-18. The home educated children ARE different. In our group, they're AMAZING - as in HANDS DOWN, the easiest to work with, the most emotionally stable, the most confident, the most flexible, the best at relating to adults as well as other youth. Oh, and also highly intelligent. Ask any of the leaders and I am certain they will concur. Does this mean we don't have publicly-educated girls with these attributes? NO! There are a few by the time they are 17 and 18 who have figured things out.
Another thing to consider is that if the child is different, it may not be BECAUSE they are home schooled. They may just BE different. And assuming that they would be "normal" if they were educated en mass is ridiculous.
In the past I have been guilty of not considering the long-term outcome. I thought that because what I was seeing right then didn't fit my preconceived idea of what I thought I should be seeing, that kids were being slighted. I now know a LOT of home schooling families and the long-term results are phenomenal. That in mind, who the heck cares if they are not at exactly the same level as their same-age peers along the way? They more than make up for it in the long-run. There is a certain young man I know who I didn't think would ever fit in with "normal" kids. I judged his parents and thought they were doing him a disservice by educating him at home. I have to admit I was wrong now. In the past two years especially, he has developed into a most amazing youth. And through the years he hasn't been ostracized by his peers because the home educated children he spends his time with respect differences in personality, don't expect everyone to be the same, and have allowed him to become who HE is, rather than trying to convince him he should be more like them.
I have never met a home schooling parent who did not REALLY care about what was best for their children and who wasn't sincerely doing what he/she feels is BEST for their child.
Home schooling families tend to function with amazing unity. Why is this? I can't be sure, but I think it's because they understand that the family is the core unit of society. The other activities they are involved in are extracurricular - they can't easily block out the family as a necessary evil because so much time is spent with the family, so they have to make it work. Instead of a few hours together in the evenings (and even that long is becoming quite unusual in most families I know), they spend many hours together every day. Why do people criticize this? Don't we WANT family to be the most important thing, both as they are growing up and when they have their own families? Their families become their best friends at a young age, rather than once they reach adulthood. Friends come and go, so why do we encourage them to develop those friendships as if they are the most important relationships?
I sent my daughter to junior high last year because she didn't want to be home schooled. She was there all of two months before she was begging us to get her out of there. We made her stay until the semester break. In the few short months she attended junior high, we noticed a huge decline in her self-confidence, her enthusiasm for life, her desire to learn, and she became depressed. Of course, this is not the experience of every publicly-educated child, but I would have been a neglectful parent to have forced her to remain in an environment that was having that effect on her. So even if she develops completely backwards social skills (which, of course, is absurd), it will be worth getting her out of that toxic environment.
The following article is from a newsletter put out by TJED.org (TJED=Thomas Jefferson Education). You can see the original source by clicking here. I think it does a good job of helping to sort out the firmly-held myths regarding socialization.
What are We Socializing Them For?
By Stephen Palmer
As
a homeschooling family, my wife and I occasionally get the predictable,
worn-out question, “But what about their social life?”
First of all, the question is utterly bizarre to me, given how much social interaction our kids get between several homeschool groups with tons of activities and outings, and myriad other activities, such as art classes, dance classes, cooking classes, Judo, flag football, etc., not to mention how much they play with neighborhood kids.
The idea that homeschoolers don’t get healthy social interaction is such a backwards, 20-years-ago perception.
Secondly, it makes me laugh when I think back to my public school experience.
Here’s what public school taught me about socialization:
But here’s where it gets really interesting: Nowhere outside of high school have any of these been my experience, at least not nearly to the degree felt in high school.
Sure, I’ve experienced the very typical (and relatively benign) perceptions and comments regarding our non-traditional views on things like education, homebirthing, politics, etc.
But nothing even close to the overt and extremely aggressive ostracization, mocking, competitiveness, and bullying I witnessed in high school.
Rather than attending high school my junior and senior years, I attended a community college through a program called Running Start.
Not a single person in college ever cared about what clothes I wore, who I hung out with, what my interests were, how old I was, etc.
It was a completely different world than high school.
In fact, in college diversity was appreciated and encouraged much more than conformity. Everyone I interacted with was respectful and accepting.
It was encouraged to question commonly-accepted truths, habits, societal arrangements, etc.
Since leaving high school, I’ve never had a single friend who cared one whit about my fashion sense (or lack thereof, as the case may be).
I’ve yet to interact with an adult who thinks it’s really cool to make fun of those less privileged than them.
I’m still waiting for an adult to bully me because they’re a year older than me, or an adult to fear me because they’re younger than me.
If socialization outside of public school is nothing like, or is at least substantially different from socialization in public school, then what in the name of John Dewey are we socializing our kids for?
For those who disagree with my experience with and perception of public school socialization, who really value socialization and worry that your kids won’t get it outside of public school, I have a sincere question for you:
What do you want your kids to get from public school socialization (or socialization in general)?
I imagine your responses would include:
Well, we share those desires.
I’m not trying to convince anyone that homeschooling is better than public schooling — as a well-adjusted, socialized adult who believes in freedom, tolerance, and diversity, I wholeheartedly respect and embrace you, no matter your opinions on the subject.
But I am inviting those who advocate public school for the sake of socialization to question what your children are actually getting in the way of socialization.
As Manfred Zysk wrote in his thought-provoking article “Homeschooling and the Myth of Socialization,”
We’re not opting them out of society.
We’re just opting them out of the strange public school bubble that, in our experience, doesn’t even represent normal, healthy society.
In other words, we’re socializing them for what they’ll actually experience beyond high school.
Stephen Palmer is a TJEd homeschooler and the co-founder of Life Manifestos.
*NOTE: If you choose to read my blog, it's not the same as my bringing up a conversation with you. If what I write bothers you, don't read it.
First of all, the question is utterly bizarre to me, given how much social interaction our kids get between several homeschool groups with tons of activities and outings, and myriad other activities, such as art classes, dance classes, cooking classes, Judo, flag football, etc., not to mention how much they play with neighborhood kids.
The idea that homeschoolers don’t get healthy social interaction is such a backwards, 20-years-ago perception.
Secondly, it makes me laugh when I think back to my public school experience.
Here’s what public school taught me about socialization:
- It’s okay — encouraged, even — to make fun of anyone “different” than you and your core group of friends, particularly the weak, weird, mentally and physically disabled, and poor.
- Within an “acceptable” range, everyone should dress, act, and think like everyone else, and those in any way and to the slightest degree outside of the norm should expect to be mocked mercilessly.
- Appearances are everything.
- You should only interact with those in your grade. Those in higher grades are cooler than you (and are therefore entitled to bully you and everyone else younger than them), and those in lower grades are less than you.
- You should compare yourself to and militantly compete with others.
- What your peers think of you is far more important than what you think of yourself, or what God thinks of you. Sacrifice everything for popularity.
- Don’t question authority; teachers and other authority figures know best. Stay in line. There’s an established, “right” way for everything — don’t deviate.
“The idea of learning acceptable social skills in a school is as absurd to me as learning nutrition from a grocery store.” -Lisa RussellBased on most accounts I’ve heard, this is quite typical public school “socialization,” which is interesting in and of itself.
But here’s where it gets really interesting: Nowhere outside of high school have any of these been my experience, at least not nearly to the degree felt in high school.
Sure, I’ve experienced the very typical (and relatively benign) perceptions and comments regarding our non-traditional views on things like education, homebirthing, politics, etc.
But nothing even close to the overt and extremely aggressive ostracization, mocking, competitiveness, and bullying I witnessed in high school.
Rather than attending high school my junior and senior years, I attended a community college through a program called Running Start.
Not a single person in college ever cared about what clothes I wore, who I hung out with, what my interests were, how old I was, etc.
It was a completely different world than high school.
In fact, in college diversity was appreciated and encouraged much more than conformity. Everyone I interacted with was respectful and accepting.
It was encouraged to question commonly-accepted truths, habits, societal arrangements, etc.
Since leaving high school, I’ve never had a single friend who cared one whit about my fashion sense (or lack thereof, as the case may be).
I’ve yet to interact with an adult who thinks it’s really cool to make fun of those less privileged than them.
I’m still waiting for an adult to bully me because they’re a year older than me, or an adult to fear me because they’re younger than me.
If socialization outside of public school is nothing like, or is at least substantially different from socialization in public school, then what in the name of John Dewey are we socializing our kids for?
For those who disagree with my experience with and perception of public school socialization, who really value socialization and worry that your kids won’t get it outside of public school, I have a sincere question for you:
What do you want your kids to get from public school socialization (or socialization in general)?
I imagine your responses would include:
- You want them to be confident, emotionally mature, well-adapted, respectful, and considerate.
- You want them to be able to interact with, relate to, and positively influence anyone, regardless of age, race, culture, or any differences of opinions or perceptions.
- You want them to have the courage to stand up for what’s right, even and especially when it’s not popular.
- You want them to be a leader, not a follower.
- You want them to learn to strive for excellence, but without feeling the need to “beat” or denigrate others in the process.
- You want them to develop the maturity to respect authority for the right reasons without accepting it unquestioningly, and, as needed, to learn to question and change things wisely and effectively.
Well, we share those desires.
I’m not trying to convince anyone that homeschooling is better than public schooling — as a well-adjusted, socialized adult who believes in freedom, tolerance, and diversity, I wholeheartedly respect and embrace you, no matter your opinions on the subject.
But I am inviting those who advocate public school for the sake of socialization to question what your children are actually getting in the way of socialization.
As Manfred Zysk wrote in his thought-provoking article “Homeschooling and the Myth of Socialization,”
“A family member asked my wife, ‘Aren’t you concerned about his (our son’s) socialization with other kids?’. My wife gave this response: ‘Go to your local middle school, junior high, or high school, walk down the hallways, and tell me which behavior you see that you think our son should emulate.’”And for those concerned that our homeschooled children aren’t getting enough or appropriate socialization, I’m inviting you to consider that there are other ways to achieve healthy socialization, and we’re not raising our kids to be cloistered, introverted misfits.
We’re not opting them out of society.
We’re just opting them out of the strange public school bubble that, in our experience, doesn’t even represent normal, healthy society.
In other words, we’re socializing them for what they’ll actually experience beyond high school.
Stephen Palmer is a TJEd homeschooler and the co-founder of Life Manifestos.
*NOTE: If you choose to read my blog, it's not the same as my bringing up a conversation with you. If what I write bothers you, don't read it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)